Back in the 1960s, a patient isolator unit was developed for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Because our immune system cells were often caught in the friendly fire, up to 50% of cancer patients died of infections before they could even complete the chemo because their immune systems had become so compromised. So, a bubble boy-like contraption was developed. The patient was shaved, dipped in disinfectant, rinsed off with alcohol, rubbed with antibiotic ointment into every orifice, and placed on a rotating regimen of a dozen of the most powerful antibiotics they had. Procedures were performed through plastic sleeves on the sides of the unit, and everything in and out had to be sterilized and passed through airlocks. So, the patient wasn’t allowed any fresh fruits or vegetables.
People went crazy cooped up in these bubble-like units, with 38% even experiencing hallucinations. Fifteen years later, the results were in: it simply didn’t work. People were still dying at the same rate; so, the whole thing was scrapped—except the diet. The airlocks and alcohol baths were abandoned, but they continued to make sure no one got to eat a salad.
Neutrophils are white blood cells that serve as our front line of defense. When we’re immunocompromised and don’t have enough neutrophils, we’re called “neutropenic.” So, the chemotherapy patients were put on a so-called neutropenic diet without any fresh fruits and vegetables. The problem is there’s a glaring lack of evidence that such a neutropenic diet actually helps (see my video Is a Neutropenic Diet Necessary for Cancer Patients?).
Ironically, the neutropenic diet is the one remaining component of those patient isolator unit protocols that’s still practiced; yet, it has the least evidence supporting its use. Why? The rationale is: there are bacteria in salads, bacteria cause infections, immunocompromised patients are at increased risk for infections, and therefore, no salad. What’s more, they are actually glad there aren’t any studies on this because it could be way too risky to give a cancer patient an apple or something. So, its continued use seems to be based on a ‘‘better safe than sorry’’ philosophy.
The problem is that kids diagnosed with cancer are already low in dietary antioxidants; so, the last thing we should do is tell them they can’t have any fresh fruit or veggies. In addition to the lack of clinical evidence for this neutropenic diet, there may be some drawbacks. Restricting fruits and vegetables may even increase the risk of infection and compromise their nutritional status.
So, are neutropenic diets for cancer patients “reasonable prudence” or “clinical superstition”? Starting in the 1990s, there was a resurgence of research when greater importance was placed on the need to “support clinical practice with evidence.”
What a concept!
Three randomized controlled trials were published, and not one supported the neutropenic diet. In the biggest study, an all-cooked diet was compared to one that allowed raw fruits and veggies, and there was no difference in infection and death rates. As a result of the study, the principal investigator at the MD Anderson Cancer Center described how their practice has changed, and now everyone is allowed to eat their vegetables—a far cry from “please don’t eat the salads” 31 years earlier.
Today, neither the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nor the American Cancer Society support the neutropenic diet. The real danger comes from pathogenic food-poisoning bacteria like Campylobacter, Salmonella, and E. coli. So, we still have to keep patients away from risky foods like undercooked eggs, meat, dairy, and sprouts. At this point, though, there really shouldn’t be a debate about whether cancer patients should be on a neutropenic diet. Nevertheless, many institutions still tell cancer patients they shouldn’t eat fresh fruits and veggies. According to the latest survey, more than half of pediatric cancer doctors continue to prescribe these diets, though it’s quite variable even among those at the same institution.
Why are doctors still reluctant to move away from the neutropenic diet? There are several reasons why physicians may be hesitant to incorporate evidence-based medicine into their practices. They may have limited time to review the literature. They’d like to dig deep into studies, but simply don’t have the time to look at the evidence. Hmm, if only there was a website… 🙂
Bone marrow transplants are the final frontier. Sometimes, it’s our immune system itself that is cancerous, such as in leukemia or lymphoma. In these cases, the immune system is wiped out on purpose to rebuild it from scratch. So, inherent in the procedure is a profound immunodeficiency for which a neutropenic diet is often recommended. This also had never been tested—until now.
Not only did it not work, a strict neutropenic diet was actually associated with an increased risk for infection, maybe because you don’t get the good bugs from fruits and vegetables crowding out the bad guys in the gut. So, not only was the neutropenic diet found to be unbeneficial; there was a suggestion that it has the potential to be harmful. This wouldn’t be the first time an intervention strategy made good sense theoretically, but, when put to the test, was ultimately ineffective.
Unfortunately, there’s an inertia in medicine that can result in medical practice that is at odds with the available evidence. Sometimes this disconnect can have devastating consequences. See, for example, Evidence-Based Medicine or Evidence-Biased? and The Tomato Effect.
The reason it is so important to straighten out the neutropenic diet myth is that fruits and vegetables may actually improve cancer survival:
- Raw Broccoli and Bladder Cancer Survival
- Breast Cancer Survival Vegetable
- Prostate Cancer Survival: The A/V Ratio
- How Not to Die from Cancer
Michael Greger, M.D.
Article SourcE: NutritionFacts.org
Be the first to comment on "Should Cancer Patients Avoid Raw Fruits and Vegetables?"